0.02/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 10:16:23 EDT 2024 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.41 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ovUmjTk7Ny/E---3.1_15185.p 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # sh2lt with pid 15263 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by sh2lt 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HGHSS-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.43 # partial match(1): HGHSS-FFMF11-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 389s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 73s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_4 with 65s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 65s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # sh2lt with pid 15270 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by sh2lt 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.44 # Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores 0.15/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.15/0.44 # Search class: HGHSS-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.44 # partial match(1): HGHSS-FFMF11-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.15/0.44 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 389s (1) cores 0.15/0.44 # Starting sh2lt with 73s (1) cores 0.15/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.44 0.15/0.44 # Proof found! 0.15/0.44 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: (a > $o) > $o). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_23, type, epred2_1: a > a > $o). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: (a > $o) > a). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_25, type, epred3_1: (a > a > $o) > a > $o). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_26, type, esk2_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_27, type, esk3_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_28, type, esk4_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.15/0.44 thf(decl_29, type, esk5_2: a > (a > a > $o) > a). 0.15/0.44 thf(cTHM262A_pme, conjecture, ![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:a]:(?[X3:a > $o]:((((X1 @ X3)&![X4:a > $o]:((((X4 @ X2)&(X1 @ X4))=>((X4)=(X3)))))&(X3 @ X2))))&![X3:a > $o]:(((X1 @ X3)=>?[X5:a]:((X3 @ X5)))))=>?[X6:a > a > $o]:(((^[X7:a > $o]:((![X2:a]:((![X8:a]:(((X6 @ X2 @ X8)<=>(X7 @ X8)))<=(X7 @ X2)))&?[X5:a]:((X7 @ X5)))))=(X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ovUmjTk7Ny/E---3.1_15185.p', cTHM262A_pme)). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:a]:(?[X3:a > $o]:((((X1 @ X3)&![X4:a > $o]:((((X4 @ X2)&(X1 @ X4))=>((X4)=(X3)))))&(X3 @ X2))))&![X3:a > $o]:(((X1 @ X3)=>?[X5:a]:((X3 @ X5)))))=>?[X6:a > a > $o]:(![X16:a > $o]:(((![X2:a]:(((X16 @ X2)=>![X8:a]:(((X6 @ X2 @ X8)<=>(X16 @ X8)))))&?[X5:a]:((X16 @ X5)))<=>(X1 @ X16))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM262A_pme])])])])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X18:a, X20:a > $o, X21:a > $o, X23:a > a > $o, X27:a, X28:a, X29:a]:((((((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X18))&(~(X20 @ X18)|~(epred1_0 @ X20)|((X20)=(epred2_1 @ X18))))&(epred2_1 @ X18 @ X18))&(~(epred1_0 @ X21)|(X21 @ (esk1_1 @ X21))))&((((epred3_1 @ X23 @ (esk2_1 @ X23))|~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X27)|~(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X23)))&((~(X23 @ (esk2_1 @ X23) @ (esk3_1 @ X23))|~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ (esk3_1 @ X23))|~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X27)|~(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X23)))&((X23 @ (esk2_1 @ X23) @ (esk3_1 @ X23))|(epred3_1 @ X23 @ (esk3_1 @ X23))|~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X27)|~(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X23)))))&(((~(X23 @ X28 @ X29)|(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X29)|~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X28)|(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X23)))&(~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X29)|(X23 @ X28 @ X29)|~(epred3_1 @ X23 @ X28)|(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X23))))&((epred3_1 @ X23 @ (esk4_1 @ X23))|(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X23))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X6:a > a > $o, X5:a]:(((X6 @ X5 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X6))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X2))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ $neq))|~((epred3_1 @ $neq @ X2)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_3])])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X6:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk4_1 @ X6))|(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X6:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk2_1 @ X6))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X6))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ $neq)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ (esk1_1 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a > $o]:((((X3)=(epred2_1 @ X2))|~((X3 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((epred3_1 @ $neq @ (esk2_1 @ $neq))|~((epred3_1 @ $neq @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred3_1 @ $neq @ (esk1_1 @ (epred3_1 @ $neq))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X6:a > a > $o]:((~((X6 @ (esk2_1 @ X6) @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X6))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:((((epred3_1 @ $neq)=(epred2_1 @ X2))|~((epred3_1 @ $neq @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_7])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (epred3_1 @ $neq @ (esk2_1 @ $neq)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X2:a, X6:a > a > $o, X5:a]:((((epred3_1 @ X6)!=(epred2_1 @ X2))|~((X6 @ (esk2_1 @ X6) @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_1 @ (esk2_1 @ $neq))=(epred3_1 @ $neq)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X2:a, X6:a > a > $o, X5:a]:((((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X6))<~>(epred2_1 @ X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X6)))|~((X6 @ (esk2_1 @ X6) @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X42:a]:(((epred2_1 @ (esk2_1 @ $neq) @ X42)<=>(epred3_1 @ $neq @ X42))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:a, X6:a > a > $o, X5:a]:((~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X6)))|~((epred2_1 @ X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X6)))|~((X6 @ (esk2_1 @ X6) @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ (esk3_1 @ X6)))|~((epred3_1 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:((epred3_1 @ (($true)) @ X2)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X2:a]:((~(($true @ (esk2_1 @ (($true))) @ (esk3_1 @ (($true)))))|~((epred2_1 @ X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (($true))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_21]), c_0_21])])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X2:a]:(~((epred2_1 @ X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:((epred2_1 @ (esk2_1 @ (($true))) @ X2)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.15/0.44 thf(c_0_25, plain, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.44 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.15/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1 0.15/0.44 # Initial clauses : 10 0.15/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.15/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10 0.15/0.44 # Processed clauses : 57 0.15/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.15/0.44 # ...subsumed : 2 0.15/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 54 0.15/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4 0.15/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 3 0.15/0.44 # Generated clauses : 115 0.15/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 74 0.15/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.44 # Paramodulations : 44 0.15/0.44 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.44 # NegExts : 1 0.15/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 4 0.15/0.44 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 34 0.15/0.44 # ...of those cached : 18 0.15/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 35 0.15/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13 0.15/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.15/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 20 0.15/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37 0.15/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 105 0.15/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 19 0.15/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40 0.15/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14 0.15/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2 0.15/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25 0.15/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3 0.15/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.15/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4750 0.15/0.44 # Search garbage collected termcells : 495 0.15/0.44 0.15/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.44 # User time : 0.008 s 0.15/0.44 # System time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.44 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.15/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1936 pages 0.15/0.44 0.15/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.44 # User time : 0.025 s 0.15/0.44 # System time : 0.006 s 0.15/0.44 # Total time : 0.031 s 0.15/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages 0.15/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting 0.15/0.44 % E exiting 0.15/0.44 EOF